‘Ann Miura-Ko’ Tags

30 considerations for getting tech to market: Part II

This is the 31st article in a continuing series that examines the state of the ecosystem necessary to successfully bring technology to market. Based on dozens of interviews with entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, angel investors, business leaders, academics, tech-transfer experts and policy makers, this series looks at what is working and what can be improved in the go-to-market ecosystem in the United States, Canada and Britain. We invite your feedback.

FM Series banner head 300x145 30 considerations for getting tech to market: Part IIBy Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

Last week, we began a three-part recap of our Commercialization Ecosystem series with insights and practical advice on securing investment capital and finding champions to help get your technology to market. We continue this week with commercialization out of the university setting, the value of mentor capital and building your startup’s DNA.

11. University researchers needs champions, too

Academic researchers should not be expected to become entrepreneurs to develop their innovations into commercially viable products. They need business-savvy champions to pick up the ball and run with it while they continue to do what they do best – research.

“Commercialization requires expertise of a very different kind, and if we don’t have enough experts in the business of commercialization and managing innovation, then that’s the shortcoming on which to focus,” Tom Brzustowski, a professor at the University of Ottawa’s Telfer School of Management wrote in The Way Ahead, Meeting Canada’s Productivity Challenge.

“Serial entrepreneurship is key … it is an entrepreneurial problem that has to be solved by entrepreneurs,” said Scott Valentine, director of marketing and communications at Solium Capital.

12. So do students

“They know the science and technology, they will need a job and so are more likely to be heavily involved in a spin-out company than a tenured faculty member, and are happy and willing to learn the ropes on how something they helped developed in a laboratory can help solve a market or social need,” wrote Scott McAuley, founder of Lunanos Inc., and outreach and entrepreneurship associate at the Institute for Optical Sciences.

“Placing highly qualified graduate or undergraduate students into a network of industry professionals creates a powerful combination of market experience, technological expertise, and innovative drive, that can create new opportunities for universities’ two greatest products: IP and graduates.”

The wall between the classroom and the real world must come down, said Ronald Weissman, chair of the Software Special Industry Group at Band of Angels.

“If universities taught entrepreneurship as a value, we would all be better for it. If I were the head of a major university, I would love to see students demonstrate their prowess by starting things in the community, profit or non-profit … when you put students in a position to lead something, to start something, it gives them a very different view of the world,” he said.

13. Have a vision for your company

For any venture to succeed, its founders must have a vision that will stretch the boundaries of what they know and challenge what they believe is attainable.

“Nothing disheartens me more than meeting an entrepreneur in B.C. who says his ambition is to one day conquer the Ontario market,” said Anthony Lee, general partner at Altos Ventures.

“As entrepreneurs and business leaders, we need to push ourselves out of our comfort zones and our time zones. We need to take advantage of emerging opportunities abroad. It isn’t easy, business seldom is, but it is the reality we live in today. It doesn’t matter if you make shoes, toilet paper or advanced telecommunications software,” said Andrew Fisher, executive VP at Wesley Clover.

14. Lever the power of diversity

Diversity, be it in terms of gender, ethnicity, industry experience or skillset, is crucial to building a strong, dynamic management team.

“Having a good balance is very important. You need a healthy debate with a diverse team of people who are right and left of center,” said software industry executive Jeff Campbell.

15. But don’t forget that you’re building a company, not an all-star team

“The value built needs to be in the company itself, not reliant on a few key people. Yes, you’ll need some talented people to help build the company, but just remember to actually build a company along the way. Good contracts, processes, strategy, oversight, margins, IP, lively meetings, strategically constructed barriers to entry, a flexible product road map, real culture, and some form of a solid CRM. These are just some of the things that give a company real value. If one or two people can leave your company and drop the value of your business in a significant way, you haven’t built a true company. And yes, that includes you,” wrote Nick Quain, co-founder and CEO of CellWand.

16. Know your startup’s DNA

It’s a myth to say there is a culture common to a typical startup. What a startup has is DNA that is as unique as the people who have founded it, a DNA which is shaped by its technology and where it fits into the market.

“Startups don’t have a common culture. This is a myth that’s been created, perhaps intentionally, by the 95 percent of people who’ve never worked for a startup … Startups have DNA, just like people. It may not surprise you to hear that a startup’s DNA is in part a mixture of its leaders’ DNA. If you think you merely have ‘startup culture,’ then you’re not driving your business, it’s driving you,” wrote Jason Flick, co-founder and president of YOU i Labs and president and CEO of Flick Software.

17. Appreciate the value of failure and risk

One of the best lessons to be learned from Silicon Valley’s culture is that failure is a virtue, provided, of course, you can demonstrate how you have learned from your failure.

“I’m a huge, huge believer in the only way you innovate is by failing. You’ve got to try different things and that means a lot of mistakes along the way. So if we can eliminate some of them, we can help clients get to market quicker and get them to do it on a more frugal budget,” said Tim Jackson, COO of Waterloo’s Accelerator Centre.

Valuing failure instead of fearing it goes hand in hand with having a healthy appetite for risk.

“Attitude towards risk is a huge barometer of entrepreneurial culture,” said Weissman.

18. Don’t overlook the value of mentor capital

A mentor, by definition, has already earned their degree in the school of hard knocks. Their counsel is often a more valuable resource for a startup than cold hard cash and the best insurance against avoiding the missteps that typically cause a startup to stumble.

“When we see companies at an early stage work with mentors, all those problems end up cut off. Talk to as many people as you can possibly humanly talk to … The more people you talk to, the fewer pitfalls you will fall into,” said Nicole Glaros, general manager of Tech Stars.

19. Seek out creative collisions

Coming together with like-minded individuals is crucial to entrepreneurial success. You must be willing to share your ideas, solicit feedback and take criticism. The environment of the typical startup incubator is an invaluable hotbed for this kind of interaction.

“The kind of client who gets in (to the Accelerator Centre) is someone who wants to learn, is not afraid to hire people who are as talented as they are, is not afraid to ask for help. So it’s a case of putting all of these smart people together, collectively they share ideas with one another and we think that having them in here, having access to the mentors, access to the community that is volunteering to help, is going to get them to market faster than if they were doing it on their own,” said Jackson.

20. Understand what it means to be lean

Eric Ries coined the term “lean startup” several years ago and recently updated his definition to mean “low burn. Of course, many startups are capital efficient and generally frugal. But by taking advantage of open source, agile software, and iterative development, lean startups can operate with much less waste.”

“Lean is not small. Lean is a tactic by which we help our entrepreneurs and our entrepreneurs help themselves in a data-driven way figure out how they’re going to iterate their product. And through data and through vision, we also pivot that business model if we believe the business model no longer works,” Ann Miura-Ko, co-founding partner with FLOODGATE, said in a lecture at Stanford titled Funding Thunder Lizard Entrepreneurs.

We conclude next week.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

30 considerations for getting tech to market: Part I

This is the 30th article in a continuing series that examines the state of the ecosystem necessary to successfully bring technology to market. Based on dozens of interviews with entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, angel investors, business leaders, academics, tech-transfer experts and policy makers, this series looks at what is working and what can be improved in the go-to-market ecosystem in the United States, Canada and Britain. We invite your feedback.

FM Series banner headART 1 300x145 30 considerations for getting tech to market: Part IBy Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

Six months ago we launched this “12-part” series to put forth ideas, yield practical insights and provoke thoughtful discussion about what it takes to get technology to market. Thanks in no small part to the enthusiastic response of our readers, we let the series evolve and grow as it would.

More than 50 posts later, including 30 we wrote plus another score of contributed articles, it is reasonable to say that we have cast at least a passing spotlight on just about every issue pertinent to such a broad subject. Dozens of individuals have shared their time and expertise with us as interviewees, subject matter experts and guest bloggers, and we thank them all.

But all good things must come to an end. While there will no doubt be the occasional post that will still bear the header, The Commercialization Ecosystem, we will be moving on to new series in a few weeks. But first, what have we learned about what it takes to get technology to market? In a three-part wrap-up, we will recap what we have learned that every entrepreneur and tech executive needs to know.

We begin today with that watershed moment.

1. You must find a problem to solve

John Stokes, a partner at Real Ventures, defined a successful entrepreneur as someone who can put together both “convergent” and “divergent” thinking. The innovator is about convergence, having a problem to solve or premise to challenge. But to get the solution to market requires divergent thinking – the ability to identify and evaluate all of the possible ways to achieve that goal.

Mobile technologist, anthropologist and conservationist Ken Banks summed it up this way: “For me, an entrepreneur is a person who is good with the idea, who is good at formulating a solution and building a good team that can execute on it … you come across something that really switches you on and inspires you to create something and you don’t get that in a school.”

2. The market must be willing to pay for the solution

“Great companies constantly test the market, for validation and feedback. When I look at a new company, I ask, ‘Where did the product come from? Did it come as a result of a market demand?’” said Ronald Weissman, chair of the Software Special Industry Group at Band of Angels.

Ann Miura-Ko, co-founding partner with FLOODGATE said in a lecture last fall at Stanford University, ”A startup is ultimately … not just about whether an idea or a product works, it is about whether or not you can create a business around it. Whether or not the ecosystem will support it, the customers will buy it, if the channels will support it, and if the manufacturers will actually create it.”

3. The old investor normal is hard to find

The venture capital industry of 10, even five, years ago no longer exists. As many VCs have shied away from early stage investments, many angel investors have stepped up to fill the void. However, their support is coming with more strings attached and higher expectations than in the past.

“They want proof points and market validation. They want to see the strength of your management team and your pipeline,” said Weissman.

4. The new normal is there is no normal

In today’s marketplace, where old enterprise sales models have been collapsed by iterative product development driven by the power of Web 2.O, cloud computing, open source and commoditized development platforms, a company has many paths to market.

“Now the capitalization of a company can be a whole combination of different resources and sources of funding. A lot of people think the old normal still exists, but only for a small group of companies,” said Iain Klugman, president and CEO of Communitech.

Added Stokes, “Those companies that are founded today are often able to compete with the ones founded five years ago with a lot fewer dollars and a lot more agility. The tech market has evolved much more quickly than the venture market.”

5. It’s all about who you get to know

Finding investors is about doing your homework and creating opportunities that will allow you to put yourself in front of them. But don’t aggressively pursue them with your elevator pitch. Get to know them and let them get to know you.

“People and relationships are the most critical factors in investment. This is why investors consistently say that the team is the most important factor in a deal. It is also why when talking about an investment, investors will often start out by saying that the founder is a great person with lots of integrity,” wrote Martin Soorjoo, founder of The Investor Pitch Clinic.

6. And how well you can speak their language

It’s not about the bells and whistles of your technology. It is about the business case for your technology.

“Product- or engineering-driven CEOs new to the VC world beg, ‘Please let me demo my product! It will change the world. For $500,000 you will own a piece of the next Facebook.’ But the story that investors need to hear is different. ‘How does your business work? How will you scale to become a profitable market leader? Is this the kind of business that meets my investors’ financial objectives?’” wrote Weissman.

7. Commercialization needs champions

A “champion” could be someone with decision-making authority within an established organization, who sees the value in a new technology and will support it by either investing money and resources into it or adopting it within their own organization.

“To commercialize, we need companies with an innovation vision willing to share risk,” said Thomas Martinuzzo, manager for business development, sciences and engineering at Gestion Univalor.

8. Go out and find your champion

If you have an idea that solves a customer’s problem, preferably a large customer, then you should be able secure “funding” from them, provided you provide them with some form of added incentive to take the risk.

“This funding might come in the form of services, prepayment on the product or even as a strategic investment. While you are out doing your market research — the part where you actually talk to potential customers – seek out these types and arrange meetings by being open about the concept product you are working on and your interest in their feedback,” wrote Jason Flick, co-founder and president of YOU i Labs and president and CEO of Flick Software.

Go for “customers who are going to push you the hardest to develop a globally competitive product,” said Chris Albinson, managing partner with Panorama Capital.

9. Champions come in various forms

Champions can also be defined as successful entrepreneurs who volunteer their time as mentors or play the role of angel investor by reinvesting the proceeds from a profitable exit back into the community. For Scott Annan, founder of Mercury Grove and Network Hippo, his decision to create a new startup accelerator came from a firm belief that “a rising tide floats all ships.”

“For entrepreneurs and executives, being active in the community and supporting other entrepreneurs and programs that are happening is crucial. Really being able to develop that strong network and allocating time to share your thoughts and experience and expertise with other companies is critical. It helps not just the entrepreneurs, but creates an environment of collaboration,” he said.

10. Champions should also be incubators of technology

There is seldom a correlation between what an established company invests in R&D and its future success in terms of revenue, Flick wrote. “Startups are famous for having successful technology R&D because they can iterate and adapt so quickly and tend to be closer to the ground – e.g. the customer. Rather than invest billions in internal R&D, many of our large technology enterprises may find their money better spent if they put a percentage into incubating startups.”

The problem, however, is that the mindset this requires often runs counter to the typical corporate culture.

“Most companies are optimized to protect and keep things inside. The ideal of letting go something that has been invested in goes against the grain of a lot of companies. I think the best thing to encourage people to do it is to show success stories,” said Frank Rimalovski, co-founder and a former partner of New Venture Partners.

We will continue next week.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Taking the lean approach to market

This is the 12th article in a continuing series that examines the state of the ecosystem necessary to successfully bring technology to market. Based on dozens of interviews with entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, angel investors, business leaders, academics, tech-transfer experts and policy makers, this series looks at what is working and what can be improved in the go-to-market ecosystem in the United States, Canada and Britain. We invite your feedback.

FM Series banner headART 1 300x145 Taking the lean approach to marketBy Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

It’s fitting that we follow up last week’s post on the strategic value of marketing in its purest sense as a process for enabling customer validation and iterative product development with a definition of this thing called lean startup.

Strategic marketing is a fundamental aspect of the lean startup methodology, a methodology first defined by Eric Ries almost three years ago. And lean startup itself as a process for bringing technology to market warrants careful consideration by any entrepreneur in the socially enabled age of Web 2.0.

It’s fitting because just this month, Ries updated his definition of lean startup based on how the concept has evolved since it was first coined.

Ries defines lean “in the sense of low burn. Of course, many startups are capital efficient and generally frugal. But by taking advantage of open source, agile software, and iterative development, lean startups can operate with much less waste.”

He also defines lean startup as an application of lean thinking, which at its most basic is about maximizing the value you provide to your customers while minimizing waste in your organization. If it ain’t focused on delivering value to the customer, get rid of it.

Ries further defines a lean startup as one that is powered by these drivers:

  • The use of platforms enabled by open source and free software.
  • The application of agile development methodologies, which dramatically reduce waste and unlock creativity in product development. (See his take on Customer Development Engineering)
  • Ferocious customer-centric rapid iteration, as exemplified by the Customer Development process explained in Steve Blank’s Four Steps to Epiphany.

“My belief is that these lean startups will achieve dramatically lower development costs, faster time to market, and higher quality products in the years to come,” Ries wrote. “Whether they also lead to dramatically higher returns for investors is a question I’m looking forward to studying.”

Now, there is obviously a bias here in favour of software plays and web startups, but the spirit behind lean startup and its roots in the broader lean thinking philosophy means there are powerful lessons to be learned here too for hardware plays that have to manufacture and ship a physical product. The whole lean movement, after all, had its origins on the Toyota assembly line decades ago.

Lean doesn’t mean small

In a lecture she gave last fall at Stanford University titled “Funding Thunder Lizard Entrepreneurs,” Ann Miura-Ko, co-founding partner with FLOODGATE, emphasized that lean doesn’t mean small.

“Lean has nothing to do with small,” she said. “In fact the amount of capital you take in has nothing to do with whether or not your ambitions are big or small. I’ve seen some of the confusion in the market where the TechCrunch people are taking about the battle between the super angels and the VCs … and I fundamentally believe that this just reflects the confusion in that marketplace.”

She cited the examples of Microsoft and Apple as tech titans that got to market with only a couple of million dollars. “Even eBay, the amount that they raised, they never used.”

“And so the best companies end up being extremely capital efficient … lean is not small,” she said. “Lean is a tactic by which we help our entrepreneurs and our entrepreneurs help themselves in a data-driven way figure out how they’re going to iterate their product. And through data and through vision, we also pivot that business model if we believe the business model no longer works.”

Lean can be part of a big vision

New York entrepreneur and startup investor Mark Birch commented in a similar vein in a blog post last week, asserting that a big innovative idea and an iterative, customer-driven approach are not mutually exclusive.

“Quite the contrary, the best entrepreneurs incorporate lean techniques but are driven by the big vision,” Birch wrote. “Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison, Larry Page/Sergey Brin and all other successful entrepreneurs had a clear vision in mind, and that is the story we all know well. What we did not see was the journey and the many steps (and missteps) that they took along the way in reaching that vision. There were pivots and dives and tucks and all sorts of contortions to get where they sit today.”

Birch advises startups to instead focus on what type of problem they are trying to solve, rather than on whether their idea is “big enough.”

“Are you tackling a broad and incredibly complex problem where there is no precedent or are you tackling a specific problem that has some proof points and validation of a recognizable problem?” he wrote. “Once you know the type of problem you are tackling, then you can better assess your journey and the tools to use in guiding your way, whether it is lean startup or some other approach.”

What’s that minimum viable product thingy again?

Now if you are confident that lean startup is the approach for you, how do you decide which features and functionality you should include in the first iterations of your product that you put at the mercy of those initial end users? Enter the minimum viable product (MVP).

Peter Hanschke, one of our associates, defined an MVP in a past post.

“An MVP is simply the minimum set of features that provide the initial value to the user of your product,” he wrote. “It is crucial that this first incarnation of your product show your value differentiation. In other words, not only must it provide that initial functionality for your first users, it also needs to show off why your product is different or unique in the market place.”

As part of a lean startup’s go-to-market strategy, an MVP is critical to validating whatever assumptions have been made about the product’s commercial potential. “Getting the MVP into the hands of users as well as demonstrating it to experts in the target market, helps to validate some of the assumptions,” Hanschke wrote. “Course correction at this stage is easier and less costly than when the product is nearly complete.

We’ll leave you with this “genuine lean startup story of a mobile app” that Ries himself recently retweeted on Twitter.

Next week, we explore the culture of risk.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Words of wisdom: Some things change with time, others don’t

This is the ninth article in a continuing series that examines the state of the ecosystem necessary to successfully bring technology to market. Based on dozens of interviews with entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, angel investors, business leaders, academics, tech-transfer experts and policy makers, this series looks at what is working and what can be improved in the go-to-market ecosystem in the United States, Canada and Britain. We invite your feedback.

FM Series banner headART 1 300x145 Words of wisdom: Some things change with time, others dontBy Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

There is a German proverb that states, “An old error is always more popular than a new truth.”

This is often evident in the business of getting technology to market, particularly among nascent entrepreneurs and startup management teams who are coming into the process of commercialization well-versed in the engineering of a product but not so much in the fundamentals of business planning, customer engagement and market development.

Today and next week we will look at the nuts and bolts of making a venture succeed with practical bits of business advice that have emerged from our various interviews for this series.

Today we will emphasize business best practices. We will not be giving these points an exhaustive treatment, but we do want to hear your thoughts and opinions in the Comments section below.

If it made sense then, it makes even more sense now

When we interviewed Doyletech’s Denzil Doyle, we asked if he thought it worthwhile to update the key bits of advice he gives entrepreneurs in his book Making Technology Happen, considering that its last edition was published a decade ago. His response? “Some things withstand the test of time.” We will begin with two of his fundamental commandments for startups:

Write a business plan – a new ventures business plan. This is a roadmap for how the company will evolve and to attract potential investors. It differs from a business plan for a going concern in that it will have little, if any, historical data from which to make revenue projections and other forecasts. It is, therefore, based on no shortage of assumptions. As Frank Peters, one of those potential investors, observed in his guest post many weeks back, entrepreneurs have to make a credible pitch that articulates when and how investors will see a return on their investment.

Have a clear product-migration strategy. “Any new venture which starts out with only one product in its portfolio is probably doomed … follow-on products should be clearly visible at the outset,” Doyle writes. A product-migration strategy is crucial to keep the market engaged with compelling new products as older products mature. Further to this, “the first product or service should be followed up very quickly with two others, one with a lower price and lower functionality and the other with a higher price and higher functionality.” But each of these products should be a “total product” that offers a complete solution to a customer’s needs.

‘The democratization of innovation’ In last week’s post, we featured comment from FLOODGATE’s Ann Miura-Ko on the democratization of innovation, which she said has three components:

  • The collapsing cost of product building
  • The ability to rapidly test business models with quick market engagement
  • The use of lean startup methodologies, which allow startups to go through more iterations of their product with less cash.

Anthony Lee, general partner at Altos Ventures and co-founder of the C100, also spoke with us about how these trends have accelerated the process of commercializing technology. It has become easier to quickly get the product and market fit right, and it is all the more crucial that startups do so. To turn these new market realities to their advantage, entrepreneurs must be willing to learn quickly, fail rapidly, and regroup without delay. This requires that they be “honest and objective about where they are with their product,” Lee said.

John Stokes, a partner at Montreal-based Real Ventures, furthers this point by saying, Your success is not based on your core ideas, it is based on how fast you can respond and reiterate the feedback coming back from your market.” Entrepreneurs must “get their heads out of the sand to see what competitors are doing, what is happening in the market, and where there are dead ends and emerging opportunities.”

Chris Albinson, managing partner of Panorama Capital and co-founder of the C100, said startups with products or services focused on larger enterprise customers must consider the value and benefits they will derive from their first customers in addition to revenue. His advice? Go for “customers who are going to push you the hardest to develop a globally competitive product.” He has found that Canadian firms in particular make the mistake of picking a Canadian customer as their first. The issue here is that Canadian customers are often “more conservative and tend not to be early adopters … they don’t have a world view when they select innovative technology” when compared to large enterprises south of the border.

Weren’t we supposed to launch v1.0 by now? Phil Newman, CEO of Pergali and one of our U.K.-based associates, said startups often have a poor understanding of just what is a “product launch” versus a beta test of their technology. Startups must be able to distinguish between the two. In his experience, entrepreneurs often underestimate when they are truly launched and lose sight of version 1.0 of their product.

“My guidance is to very clearly state what v1.0 of the technology is and just deliver that,” he said. “Companies always see new ways for how their technology can be developed, what new capability can be added in, but then are frustrated by delayed market entry. They are actually working on v1.3 when they haven’t put out v1.0 yet. Don’t burn your cash and don’t waste your time, or anyone else’s.”

Newman also finds that startups often “don’t think about the post sales support infrastructure sufficiently to scale the company. This is where growth is hindered or delayed … sprinters must hand off to the middle-distance runners,” who he defines as “a good middle-management team that thrives on delivering continuity and quality.”

Next week, we will revisit the people factor and the challenges that are often posed by that person in the mirror.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Words of wisdom: What can you learn from a thunder lizard?

This is the eighth article in a continuing series that examines the state of the ecosystem necessary to successfully bring technology to market. Based on dozens of interviews with entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, angel investors, business leaders, academics, tech-transfer experts and policy makers, this series looks at what is working and what can be improved in the go-to-market ecosystem in the United States, Canada and Britain. We invite your feedback.

FM Series banner headART 1 300x145 Words of wisdom: What can you learn from a thunder lizard?By Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

“A startup is ultimately … not just about whether an idea or a product works, it is about whether or not you can create a business around it. Whether or not the ecosystem will support it, the customers will buy it, if the channels will support it, and if the manufacturers will actually create it. And because of that, we need to be able to test all these different facets of our business model, and do so quickly.”

This comes from someone Forbes calls “the most powerful woman in startups,” Ann Miura-Ko, co-founding partner with FLOODGATE. In October, she gave a lecture at Stanford University titled “Funding Thunder Lizard Entrepreneurs,” which is filled with so much insight we were tempted to just transcribe the whole damned thing and offer it up as a blog post of its own. However, her talk is available as a conveniently indexed webcast.

Perhaps her comments resonate with you as common sense of the most practical sort. Perhaps they don’t. Regardless, it’s much easier to talk in theoretical terms about what it takes to successfully launch a startup and bring technology to market than it is to follow through and execute effectively.

Next week, we will recap some practical bits of advice that have emerged from our interviews and research for this series. But first, we will explore some of the common factors that have spelled the doom of many a startup and refer back to Miura-Ko’s Stanford lecture for some insight on how current realities have impacted the art and science of entrepreneurship.

Why do startups fail?

It ain’t rocket science. You don’t have to look far to find some compelling answers to this question.

In their September 2009 report for Canada’s National Angel Capital Organization, “Understanding the Disappearance of Early-stage and Start-up R&D Performing Firms,” authors Douglas Barber and Jeffrey Crelinsten interviewed the senior executives of 18 R&D-intensive tech companies that had disappeared, either through bankruptcy, liquidation or merger. Among the key factors attributed for the demise of these companies were:

  • No revenue from customers
  • No input from customers on R&D performed or on the product or service being developed
  • Misreading of markets (e.g. overestimate size, delay market entry)
  • Product not needed or not simple enough for the application
  • Poor sales and marketing decisions (e.g. distribution channels vs. direct sales, delay going global or going global too quickly)
  • Timing wrong; the product or service was too early or too late.
  • Unaware of competitors and changing market conditions

But, gentle reader, don’t leap to the hasty conclusion that this lack of sufficient market research and customer engagement is in any way unique to Canada. Many moons later, a similar study in the U.S. by the self-professed data geeks at ChubbyBrain surveyed 32 startup entrepreneurs about the factors that had contributed to the demise of their failed ventures. The majority of respondents were U.S. based, with a few from India and Europe. The results were distilled into the chart below:

startup failure post mortem top reasons Words of wisdom: What can you learn from a thunder lizard?

As you can see, issues related to market research and customer engagement ranked high. These and many of the other common factors revealed though ChubbyBrain’s research often cropped up during our interviews for this series.

‘The democratization of innovation’

What does Miura-Ko have to say about how market research and customer engagement, or a lack thereof, can mean the difference between success and failure?

Much of her lecture revolved around “the democratization of innovation,” which has three key components:

  • The collapsing cost of product building. This should not be confused with the cost of company building. This is characterized by open source, commoditized technology, crowd-sourced infrastructure and elastic computing power thanks to the cloud. “I see my students all the time just taking out their credit cards and building a product, rapidly prototyping something and seeing if it works,” she said.
  • Rapid business model testing. This is illustrated by her quote with which we began this post. She went to say, “The beauty of the Internet is that you can have a direct dialogue now with your customer. In one of my classes, if I ask my students to test out a web startup. They can go out and interview 300 people in the bat of a eye and be able to tell you if that product was attractive to that group of people or not. And it is not unusual for our students to do so. Think of the people who have actual resources to put to bear on that.”
  • Running out of iterations. This gets into Steve Blank and Eric Ries’s concept of “lean startup.” This is the notion of customer development and agile programming and how you bring it together to achieve rapid iteration. This allows you to experiment quickly and effectively to stretch your dollars further. “It’s not that you’re running out of cash when you’re an entrepreneur, you’re running out of iterations … you run out of iterations, you don’t have any hope anymore.” (We will explore the lean startup methodology in more detail in a couple of weeks.)

In other words, traditional enterprise sales models have been collapsed by social and new media channels that facilitate early customer engagement and shorten time to market. The “collapsing cost of product building” has made it far easier to bring a software service or product to market compared to 10 or even five years ago.

Even for hardware plays, greater capital efficiencies can now be found thanks to fire sales of equipment and IP from companies claimed by the recession, by outsourcing low-cost components and by the shifting partition between hardware and software.

It can be argued that there has never been a better time than now to bring technology to market. But as we explored at the outset of this series, all of these advantages will only pay off if the startup is focused on the right starting point – that potential customer it hopes will ultimately buy the product or service it wants to develop. Every effort must be made from the outset to determine who they are, where they are, what they want, and how much they are willing to pay. Market development must be carried in tandem with product development.

To once again quote Ronald Weissman, chair of the Software Special Industry Group at one of Silicon Valley’s oldest angel organizations, Band of Angels, “Great companies constantly test the market, for validation and feedback.”


 Words of wisdom: What can you learn from a thunder lizard?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,