Author Archive for Leo Valiquette

The value of shooting the breeze

This is the next entry in our “Best of” series, in which we venture deep into the vault to replay blog opinion and insight that has withstood the test of time. Today’s post hails from January, 2009. We welcome your feedback.

Fotolia 27389812 XS 300x200 The value of shooting the breeze  By Danny Sullivan

At inmedia, we frequently position ourselves against those whose perspective is that PR is “all about relationships.” And, while I wholeheartedly stand by our mantra that it is the ability to convey a story and not the relationship that dictates PR success, it cannot be denied that relationships are still important. They are even more relevant from the perspective of a PR firm’s clients than for the PR firm itself. PR firms come and go but, assuming a company sticks around, its relationship with its target media will last forever.

This week, one of my clients traveled to New York to meet face to face with a group of editors from a key trade publication that covers his company’s market. Was this meeting at the request of the editors? No, we brokered it from our end. Was it for an article they were working on? No. So why was this meeting happening? Simple. It was for the relationship.

While our client had some exposure to the publication, the relationship was very much the domain of inmedia, the PR firm. This is, of course, perfectly understandable – the very reason you have a PR firm is to maintain your relationship with the media, and this remains a core part of our business – but huge value can be gained on all sides from extending the media relationship to include the client at a deeper level.

So what happened in this meeting in New York? Well, they shot the breeze. Discussed the state of the industry, talked a bit about the company and what was going on with it, but no hard pitches for stories, no Q&A, no pressure to come up with the goods.

So where was the value in this meeting, you might ask. Why not ask my client, who left the meeting full of enthusiasm for the people he had just met, and excited about the future prospects for working with them. Or why not ask the editors, who expressed delight at the meeting and a desire to do so again at some point in the near future. Value was seen on all sides from a meeting that accomplished little in hard results.

Sure, inmedia could have handled this meeting ourselves, but our preoccupation with achieving results for clients would no doubt have created a different atmosphere. Sometimes stepping back from the day-to-day hard selling of stories and constant attempts to generate coverage can result in a far more rewarding result – a blooming relationship.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

How stale is your contact list?

This is the next entry in our “Best of” series, in which we venture deep into the vault to replay blog opinion and insight that has withstood the test of time. Today’s post hails from February, 2009. We welcome your feedback.

Fotolia 27389812 XS 300x200 How stale is your contact list?By Leo Valiquette

There is no question that we PR types are often taken to task for blitzing the world with news of little relevance or importance or, at least, for failing to ensure that the news is relevant and important to the hapless targets in range of our scatter guns.

In an ongoing series of posts chronicling his study of the pitches that flood his inbox, research analyst Josh Bernoff has been examining why three quarters of the PR email he receives is irrelevant. He makes the point of saying, “I really like working with PR people, I just don’t like all of their tactics.” After working for 14 years as an analyst and being barraged by tens of thousands of emails during that time, he believes his exercise in navel-gazing is well justified.

Among the points he makes is that far too much of the email he receives is related to research areas he covered years before, but is not relevant to what he is doing now. Obviously, too little research is done to ensure information in a contact database is up to date.

The simple fact is, things change. Publications fold and people move on to new jobs or assume new responsibilities. When it comes to those media contact and editorial calendar databases to which many of us subscribe, their accuracy and timeliness is often dependent on media outlets voluntarily responding to requests to update their information. I can say from previous experience as a business journal editor bombarded by irrelevant pitches that such requests often go unanswered.

In the end, the most effective way to verify if a particular journalist or editor is an appropriate target for the news you have to pitch is to visit their publication’s website.

Case in point. We recently re-engaged with a client after a two-year hiatus. It had been a long time since we created their target media list and we emphasized the value of budgeting into the project the time and cost necessary to go through the list one name at a time to verify and update the information.

They saw our point, and thankfully so. Forty to 50 per cent of the contacts we had were no longer accurate for reasons that included staff turnover, defunct publications, and changes to the email addresses and phone numbers of those contacts who were still appropriate targets for this particular client’s news. If we hadn’t undertaken this process, up to half of our outreach on this client’s behalf would have been a misfire.

Not all media outlets are forthcoming on their “Contact Us” or “About Us” pages with individual staff bios, beats covered and contact information, but most are. It can be tedious to visit dozens of websites to dig up and verify this kind of information, but without a doubt, it is the only assured way to get your client’s story where it needs to go.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Make like a duck: Paddle hard, paddle often

This is the next entry in our “Best of” series, in which we venture deep into the vault to replay blog opinion and insight that has withstood the test of time. Today’s post hails from May 2009. We welcome your feedback.

Fotolia 27389812 XS 300x200 Make like a duck: Paddle hard, paddle oftenBy Leo Valiquette

Recently, Francis fielded a question on LinkedIn about the value of running a survey to generate media coverage.

Surveys can be used effectively to position a company, but not if the company is perceived simply as a sponsor of an external survey. Francis cited the example of one IT consultancy that, on inmedia‘s counsel, did away with its external survey of CIOs and instead realized much better media traction from publishing the results of an internal census of its own IT experts. The spotlight was shifted from a group of faceless CIOs to the consultancy’s own knowledge keepers, positioning the consultancy as an authoritative subject matter expert rather than a mere survey sponsor.

As the editor of a business publication, I saw almost daily news releases plugging a survey that, on the surface at least, provided profound insights into one issue or another of relevance to the Ottawa business community. However, the appeal factor quickly evaporated when, upon closer inspection, it was revealed that said survey was sponsored by a major credit card company or software vendor.

This made the objectivity of the data presented, and the conclusions drawn from it, immediately suspect to me. After all, the sponsoring organization would not go to the time and effort to promote survey results that didn’t support its own sales and marketing efforts, now would it? It was this obvious vested interest that made me reluctant to devote even a couple of hundred words of coverage with an online news brief.

When trying to come up with ingenious and cunning ways to engage with the media, there is, once again, simply no substitute for taking the time and effort to understand:

1. Who are the media that are relevant to your organization? Which ones have the clout to move your market and a focus that includes the products and services that you offer?

2. Who on staff specifically covers your offering or the specific markets that you target?

3. What kind of content is the publication looking for and how can you provide it? When you pursue potential customers, you position your product or service as a solution to a problem. Attracting the interest of the media is no different. In Francis’s example above, by putting the spotlight on its own internal thought leaders, this IT consultancy was conveying the value it could provide to a publication in search of expert opinion and insight on pertinent issues and topics.

Answering these questions takes research and the patience and persistence to secure that all-important first conversation with an editor. This is relationship building based upon your ability to offer something that is relevant and valuable. Prove that you’re useful, and your foot is firmly wedged in the door. It is not about flogging today’s news release, though that does present a good excuse to pick up the phone.

Don’t operate under the false assumption that following this process faithfully is a magic bullet that guarantees results, or that great things will happen overnight. It still takes time.

For one client, I have been working to place a leadership piece with a key publication since February. The editor held on to the draft we submitted for almost two months before coming back with requested revisions that essentially gut much of the article’s original focus and content. But he’s still interested. With another magazine that lies at the pinnacle of this client’s wish list, I have been touching base with the editor every few weeks for the past three months and finally hope to garner a firm commitment in June when work commences on a signature fall issue.

Invariably, great results are the result of this kind of furious paddling below the waterline, rather than something like a sponsored survey that can fall into the category of gimmickry. The sooner you take to the water and get to work, the sooner those media clippings will begin to add up.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

On the hunt for the ‘unambiguous value statement’

This is the next entry in our “Best of” series, in which we venture deep into the vault to replay blog opinion and insight that has withstood the test of time. Today’s post hails from September 2009. We welcome your feedback.

Fotolia 27389812 XS 300x200 On the hunt for the ‘unambiguous value statement’By Leo Valiquette

It’s been a while since I have expounded on the subject of reference customers. (OK, it’s been a while since I’ve expounded on any subject on this blog, but here I am, back in form.)

In our work at inmedia, where we strive to engage with the editors of specific trade and industry titles to sell them on the merits of a client’s story, enthusiastic reference customers who can articulate the pain points that were addressed by our clients’ products will, more often than not, make the editor sit up and take notice.

Customers who have actually opened their wallets for a vendor’s product or service provide validation and demonstrate uptake in the market. They can speak in dollars-and-cents terms about why they adopted a particular product and the benefits and return on investment they have derived from it.

Please note the emphasis on that last part. A customer testimonial along the lines of “we thought this was a great product and we highly recommend it” is so utterly void of tangible value that it’s better to not have it at all.

When developing an in-depth article such as a white paper or case study with an agreeable reference customer who scrutinizes the worth of every expenditure, it’s easy to delve deep and get beyond such a vapid endorsement.

In my freelance work, however, I have found myself working on a number of projects for clients who have taken the other approach to getting their name in a desired industry publication–they’ve paid their way by purchasing advertising space for a corporate profile. Which is all well and good, but to ensure those dollars have been well spent and the potential for lead generation is maximized, the copy must sing with the same unambiguous value statements expected of a case study that has passed muster with a competent editor dedicated to providing his or her readers with the information and opinion they need to run their businesses more effectively.

Too often, however, I see paid profiles, or advertorials, that come across as brochure-ware, produced either by writers who do not have the benefit of a journalism background, or worse, by a committee of the organization’s marketing staff and senior management.

It’s not that these profiles are poorly written (well, not always), or fail to convey core messaging, but they have often been developed with a lack of appreciation for three key points:

  • This is an ad. That means the odds of actually engaging with a reader have just taken a nosedive, considering that the publication’s editorial content is also vying for their attention.
  • We are all busy and pressed for time. We often don’t read, we skim. We take only a couple of seconds to decide if something is of value to us before flipping past it.
  • People don’t want to read a bunch of quotes attributed to stakeholders in the organization. Flagrant self-promotion is a dish best served as an appetizer, not as a main course.

What does this mean?

  • It means a 900-word profile that fills more than half of a full-page ad with grey text has little chance of being read.
  • It means that you don’t have the luxury of wowing readers with colourful prose which details the rich and successful history of the organization before getting down to the nitty gritty of why your products and services are relevant to them.
  • It means that an unambiguous value statement from an enthusiastic customer eager to put their name beside what they have to say is not only essential, it should probably lead the piece.

And on that last point, don’t try to micro-manage the process and put the words you want to hear in the mouth of your reference customer for their rubber-stamped approval. Yes, some degree of polishing and massaging will no doubt be necessary, but let the customer express the value points that mattered most to them in their own words. They are, after all, representative of the people you are trying to reach. To have relevance and resonance, this value statement should come across as sincere and true. This is also worth keeping in mind when developing an effective news release.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

QNX’s customer-centric culture pays dividends

ocri exectalks2 300x50 QNX’s customer centric culture pays dividendsBy Leo Valiquette

It has been a thirty-year journey for Ottawa’s QNX Software Systems, largely under what has jokingly been referred to as “stealth mode.” Last year, the company saw its brand boosted through its acquisition by Research in Motion as the mobile device maker sought out QNX’s expertise in realtime operating systems (RTOS) to help make its Playbook a reality.

But though it remained relatively unknown in its own backyard, QNX had already cemented its market position before RIM came knocking thanks to its own unique customer-centric approach and the support of its previous owner, Harman International. Derek Kuhn, vice-president of sales and marketing, and Sebastien Marineau-Mes, vice-president of engineering, spoke this morning at OCRI’s execTALKS breakfast about how their company has evolved over the years.

QNX’s RTOS products have been applied in a broad variety of embedded applications, from the Space Shuttle program to Cisco routers and military radios. With Harman, QNX broke into the automotive market for infotainment and telematics platforms. Today its technology is found in 20 million vehicles worldwide, from GM’s Onstar to high end systems in luxury cars in which the dash is a fully customizable digital display.

In fact, one could wonder, and rightly so, how QNX has become so many things to so many verticals, without stretching itself too thin. But Kuhn said it all comes back to focusing on one specific strength.

“Even though we are applicable to many different industries, we are focused on one thing, a rock solid platform,” he said, adding that addressing the specific needs of a particular market forces the company to be more innovative and competitive. And innovations for one industry often lead to product improvements that allow QNX to better serve customers in other verticals.

An RTOS by its very definition is one that provides 100 per cent reliability. There is little patience among end users for slow boot up times or the “blue screen of death.” But it is about more than just the technology. Here are some of the key ingredients Kuhn and Marineau-Mes cited for QNX’s success.

Being one with the customer …

QNX’s customers are invariably working on large and complex projects where failure to meet a delivery deadline is always a risk but not an option, such as bringing a new automobile to market. Its people will “embed” themselves (their pun, not mine) inside the customer’s organization to work in partnership and take responsibility for getting the job done on time.

… means being where the customers are …

Having a strong presence on the ground in Europe and Asia has been fundamental to QNX’s success. Kuhn said the company absolutely had to be in the same time zone as the big systems integrators and electronics manufacturers with which it has worked.

… and building an open relationship.

It isn’t just about building the deliverable to spec and coming in on time and on budget. It is about adding value. Often, this means challenging the conventional wisdom and making the case to the customer when you believe there is a better way than what they had in mind.

“It’s extremely important to be a part of what your customers are involved in,” Kuhn said. “We don’t want to be seen just as a vendor.” Often, this means working the relationship to get past the procurement people to the decision makers at the top in order to engage in a meaningful dialogue about their vision and how you can work together to make it happen.

A lot has changed in 30 years

QNX has what Marineau-Mes described as a “very strong technical culture” in that it doesn’t make promises to its market that it isn’t reasonably confident it can deliver on over the long term. Constant reinvention has been crucial to QNX remaining on the leading edge of its technology. For me, this tied in with what we have blogged about before about the need for a technology company to have a clear product migration strategy.

It’s all about your team

Being able to offer such a broad variety of projects has been a big draw to get good people in the door, Kuhn said. However, the challenge has been how far afield the company has had to shop to find the niche expertise it needs and how it has had to market Ottawa as a desirable place in which to work and live as part of its recruitment efforts. And to retain those hires, the company has come to realize the value of providing opportunities for professional and personal development.

The Apples of the world are not impregnable

With the Playbook squaring off against Apple’s iPad, QNX and the larger RIM organization certainly have a challenge before them. But fortune favours the bold. The key is to take stock of the strengths and weaknesses of both yourself and your competitors. In this instance, part of the strategy for the Playbook is to position it in the enterprise market, which remains Apple’s soft spot, by levering the expertise RIM has garnered in this arena with the Blackberry.

“It’s very motivating and exciting,” Marineau-Mes said.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Making the SaaS model work for you as a vendor

smarTALK wordmark Making the SaaS model work for you as a vendorBy Leo Valiquette

“Software as a service (SaaS, typically pronounced [sæs]), sometimes referred to as ‘software on demand,’ is software that is deployed over the Internet and/or is deployed to run behind a firewall on a local area network or personal computer. With SaaS, a provider licenses an application to customers either as a service on demand, through a subscription, in a ‘pay-as-you-go’ model, or (increasingly) at no charge when there is opportunity to generate revenue from streams other than the user, such as from advertisement or user list sales.”

Wikipedia

Offering customers this option versus the traditional model of selling boxes of CDs in shrink wrap is a “price of admission capability for software companies these days,” Rob Bell, director of service operation and corporate IT for Kinaxis, said at OCRI’s #smarTALKS event last night.

Bell was part of a panel that included Marc Brule, vice president of client services at Halogen Software, Aydin Mirzaee, co-CEO of ChideIT, and moderator Jeff Bennett, CEO and partner at ServiceVantage Corp. They discussed the transition from the industry’s traditional revenue model to a co-hosted SaaS model.

The key message? The SaaS model puts software vendors closer than ever before to the end users of their products. This is a paradigm shift that, perhaps paradoxically, creates fresh challenges and new ways to get it wrong even as it provides some distinct benefits for both users and vendors.

Here are the Top 10 takeaways from the discussion:

1. You can engage the end user at a client organization far easier than before as opposed to the traditional model, in which the client organization’s IT staff were often a barrier to entry, said Mirzaee. However, Brule added that at large corporations, the IT staff are still the gatekeepers who must be appeased, regardless of how the end users may be chomping at the bit.

2. Are you a low margin, high volume vendor? How about a high margin, low volume one? Maybe you’re somewhere in the middle. Regardless of where you fall on this spectrum, you must be prepared to meet customer’s expectations and be able to manage service and support in a way that will not kill your margins.

3. Regardless of how you respond to the previous point, the subscription model typical of SaaS has the benefit of smoothing out the peaks and valleys of revenue and cash flow. It is a far more regular and predictable model.

4. The vendor must regularly reach out to find new complimentary skill sets that will allow it to field a better SaaS product, said Brule. However, given how close the vendor is to the customer, it is better in the end to keep as much in house as possible. “No one is going to care about your customers as much as you do,” he said.

The one exception to this concerns security, said Bell. Engaging with third-party specialists is often the best way to test and ensure the integrity of your system against risk.

5. Word of mouth may represent your most powerful sales tool … and your greatest fear. This is particularly true in a high-volume, low-margin sales model, said Mirzaee.

6. Consider which model works best for your sales team. There are two sides to your sales effort — the hunters who secure new customers and the farmers who work to ensure existing customers renew or commit to an annual contract versus month to month. These two roles are better separated in a high-volume business, but may work better if combined in a low-volume business.

7. How do you maintain stickiness when it is so easy for the customer to “rip and replace” or when you are competing against giant vendors such as SAP or Oracle? Exceptional support and service is key, said Mirzaee. Another way is to maintain customer’s data, so that if they leave, they know their data is still there if they come back.

Also, add features and functionality to your product that make it an integral part of the client organization by supporting processes and departments other than its own core function, said Brule. Don’t design it to exist in a silo.

Lastly, and this comes back to the value of word of mouth, use existing customers as references to garner credibility, said Bell. Further to this, Bell emphasized the importance of staying in touch with customers and discussing the challenges they are facing. “Reach out to your customer on a regular basis,” he said. “Talking to them about what they are doing will tell if you are going to have a retention problem.”

8. Brule added that stickiness also starts at the outset of the customer relationship. At Halogen, nothing is sold without a training and implementation package to ensure full knowledge of the product is transferred to end users. This ensures the value of the product is realized by the customer and it doesn’t end up as shelfware.

9. When a customer does slip away, perform an exit interview. At Halogen, whenever a customer leaves, they get a call from the customer services group, said Brule. This can give telling insight into whether it was a shortcoming of the product that led to the loss of the customer, a shortcoming that could be addressed in future versions of the product.

10. Since the SaaS model puts the vendor so close to the customer, new iterations of the product can be implemented every few days with new features, functionality and bug fixes based on user feedback. But this also puts the onus on the vendor to be responsive and sympathize with where a customer is coming from. It is all part of the process of ensuring your product continues to evolve with the needs of the market.

“Treat every customer complaint or issue as an opportunity,” said Bell.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Creative, emotional, evocative: Getting the attention of overwhelmed consumers

OCRI Zone5 137K 300x48 Creative, emotional, evocative: Getting the attention of overwhelmed consumersBy Leo Valiquette

Do you remember that Knorr commercial about how it had reduced sodium in its packaged side dishes?

Global advertising agency DDB Worldwide took a clever approach to promote a relatively humdrum message by portraying the perspective of that one individual unhappy about sodium reduction. It came up with an ad that features a despondent little salt shaker neglected at the family dinner table who trudges out of the house into a cold dark world.

Such creativity, says Jeff Swystun, is the most powerful force in business, especially in today’s world where technology has fuelled social interaction between consumers and the brands they use like never before. In this new reality, advertisers and marketers can no longer afford to focus on connecting people to brands. They must instead focus on connecting people to people.

Swystun, chief communications officer with DDB Worldwide, spoke at yesterday’s OCRI Zone5ive event about how changes in consumer habits, behaviour and social engagement via the Internet are driving fundamental shifts in how advertisers and marketers must approach what they do.

“Consumers and customers are getting more sophisticated, and yet we continue to treat them like children,” said Swystun.

In recent years, there has been a trend toward bombarding consumers and customers from every side, through every medium possible, with intrusive advertising. This 360-degree approach is costly and, ultimately, a big turn off for the target audience. Instead, brands today must focus on only six degrees — that is, the mere six degrees of separation that is said to exist between every individual on the planet.

The thinking behind this is, if you give people what they really want, when they really want it, and let them pass it on through their own human networks, it will drive a conversation in the marketplace that will secure substantial mind-share and provide invaluable intelligence that brand owners can use to make their product or service more appealing. This applies whether the product or service in question is for the B2B or B2C market.

“Branding will always be a democratic process that is about consumer choice,” Swystun said. “Our job is to help people make that choice without them feeling like they have been manipulated.”

But how can this be done in today’s environment, in which people have full freedom of choice to engage, or not engage, and are overwhelmed by the range of choices before them?

First:

Creativity must be aimed at changing people’s behaviour, and thinking, not just entertaining and informing. Swystun offered an excellent example of this with Volkswagen’s campaign to promote its BlueMotion Technologies intended to reduce the environmental impact of its vehicles without sacrificing performance. The challenge was to drum up consumer interest in buying vehicles with this technology. In other words, change their buying habits.

With a campaign that cost only about $120,000, DDB came up with The Fun Theory, intended to demonstrate through a series of experiments that the easiest way to change people’s behaviour is to make change fun. One of the most popular was encouraging people to use the stairs instead of the escalator by turning the steps into functional piano keys (it worked). The Youtube video for this experiment alone enjoyed more than a million views around the world.

For DDB, the campaign was a clear success, illustrated by the simple fact that this was the only marketing effort Volkswagen engaged in for BlueMotion and consumers responded in droves.

Second:

Ideas must appeal on an emotional, not a rational, level. Neuroscience studies show that rational arguments do not change people’s behaviour, emotional ones do. So tell a story that makes people smile, laugh or cry. This  applies even to B2B companies. Sure, tout the rational benefits of your product or service and its ROI, but package that message with some kind of emotional hook, such as sympathizing with the key pain points of your customers that you aim to address.

Watch this McDonald’s spot for a chuckle.

Third:

Share ideas people want to share. To promote Phillips’ new flat screen television, DDB came up with a campaign called Parallel Lines, in which five directors came up with their own short films based on the same five lines of dialogue. The premise was “There are millions of ways to tell a story. There’s only one way to watch one.” The campaign was so successful it sparked a competition for other directors to come up with a sixth film. The winner was Porcelain Unicorn.

What’s next?

Reluctant to be tagged as one of those prognosticators who make outlandish predictions for which they are seldom held accountable, Swystun nonetheless offered his thoughts on where the marketplace appears to be going in the next few years.

  • Collaboration: with the trend of six degrees, customers are playing a greater role in the marketing process to drive what marketers do next.
  • Product development: All the chatter and sharing between people through social media is adding value to the entire process of new product development and how brands should position themselves to remain relevant. What people are saying is invaluable feedback for improvement and enhancement.
  • More technological advances: In which direction technology will go way is anyone’s guess, but there is little doubt that more information will be dumped more quickly into the hands of consumers, who will struggle more and more to make sense of the onslaught.
  • Credibility, authenticity are key: With so much information coming at them, people will start to tune out those content streams and sources of content that don’t stand up as credible. Instead of following hundreds, if not thousands of people on Twitter, for example, Swystun believes consumers will scale that back to 100, 50, or even 20. It will, therefore, be vital for a brand to develop trust with its audience.
  • Choice vs. clutter: All of us will be challenged to wade through the range of choice before us. Brands that simplify people’s lives and that are perceived as credible will lead.
  • The process of creativity will have to change: This will be an inevitable result of the previous points.

Swystun finished by saying that one of the most important and powerful metrics over the next 10 years to guide advertising and marketing efforts will be how many messages consumers chose not to connect with.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Marketing tips from that big bold brand we call Canada

By Leo Valiquette

canadian tourism commission logo 49e5ff9dbf seeklogocom Marketing tips from that big bold brand we call CanadaThe Canadian Tourism Commission (CTC) is one of Canada’s leading marketing organizations, tasked with making the most of the fact that, when it comes to having a globally recognized brand in the international tourism industry, Canada ranks number one.

CTC president and CEO Michele McKenzie spoke at the Ottawa Chamber’s monthly Eggs n’ Icons breakfast this morning about how the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver served as a platform for promoting that brand to the world and how, in the Olympics’ “afterglow,” the challenge remains on how to capitalize on all that positive press.

International tourism is a huge and growing market. According to McKenzie, emerging economies are firing shots across the bow of traditional, more established tourism destinations that must scramble to maintain market share, redefine their messaging and ensure their brand remains visible in markets such as Brazil, China and Korea. These emerging markets are experiencing dramatic growth in the volume of outbound travellers versus “traditional” sources of foreign tourists, such as France, Germany and Great Britain.

While Canada has experienced steady growth in the volume of foreign visitors, 80 per cent of our tourism industry remains driven by domestic tourists. While this is a rich and valued customer base, McKenzie acknowledged, and rightly so, that it is limited, especially compared to a market such as China, which expects to have 100 million (yes, that number is correct) outbound tourists heading to international destinations by 2020.

As a big brand with a premium product to sell, we need to put ourselves on the radar of these huge new customer segments. As with any business, we can’t afford to keep most of our eggs in one basket. Market diversification is crucial to long-term sustainability.

In 2010, the CTC saw a huge opportunity with the Winter Olympics in Vancouver. The CTC didn’t set out to promote the Olympics, but to use it as a platform to showcase Canada abroad with the international media.
The challenge was to “get those three billion viewers of the Olympics to stop thinking about Canada as ‘a place I want to visit before I die,’ to ‘a place I want to visit right now,’” McKenzie said. Building a rapport with the international media was crucial.

The CTC soon found that the international media were eager to eat up anything that the CTC could provide to flesh out their coverage of the Olympics. As our own Francis Moran and Cyan Solutions’ Kathryn Schwab explored in last week’s Zone5ive event, media today are starved for resources. Providing them with pre-packaged multimedia content for easy consumption can be key to gaining top tier coverage.

It was no different for the CTC. For the first time, it found itself serving as a content provider. Never before had it given such volumes of raw b-roll to media to edit and package as they saw fit. In the past, the emphasis had always been on managing the message as much as possible. But the new approach paid off in spades with reams of international exposure for Canada as a place to visit.

Another angle the CTC took was to make the torch relay, which was the longest ever, appeal to international audiences as more than just “a bunch of Canadians running around Canada.” Foreign media personalities and celebrities, such as Bollywood star Akshay Kumar, Indian Ambassador for the Games, were invited to run in the relay. The result? High profile individuals such as Kumar became enthusiastic promoters of Canada in their home countries.

In the wake of the Olympics, the CTC is already tracking some preliminary gains from its efforts. The number of foreign visitors from the U.K. and Australia, for example, has more than doubled between 2009 and 2010.

However, much remains to be done. Now that the demand, the market appetite, has been generated, it must be fed. As with any product or service that has caught the interest of a large and lucrative customer base, the worst thing that can happen next is failing to have in place the logistics, infrastructure and processes to balance supply and demand.

On this front, Canada remains burdened by a visa system far more onerous than those found in many of the other destinations it is competing against. We also lag other markets in terms of open skies agreements that provide easy air access and one-stop flights to Canada.

McKenzie cited the example of Brazil. Last year, one million Brazilian tourists visited the U.S., but only 68,000 came to Canada. There is only one direct flight from Brazil to Canada. All other available flights must route through the U.S., which requires two visas instead of one. Faced with that headache, is it any wonder that most Brazilians favour the U.S. over Canada?

But of course, to build a healthy and sustainable business, one cannot afford to ignore whatever untapped opportunities remain in a mature market while pursuing new ones. For the CTC, that means reaching out to Canada’s youth.

According to McKenzie, most young people today “view international tourism as their birthright” thanks to the influence of their globe-trotting baby boomer parents. The marketing challenge here is to sell them on the merits of exploring their own country before they spend their tourism dollars abroad.

“Tourism is a rapidly expanding sector,” McKenzie said. “One I see as a high stakes game.”

But are the stakes any different for businesses in other sectors trying to grow and compete in today’s global marketplace? As the CTC understands, regardless of your industry, defining and executing a strategic marketing program is key.

Photo from: Seeklogo

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Should Amy Chua consider any publicity good publicity?

300px amy chua 2007 235x300 Should Amy Chua consider any publicity good publicity?By Leo Valiquette

More often than not, clients of inmedia will set their sights on coverage in a flagship business publication like the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s or Fortune. Sometimes a client has a story that would appeal to such a prestigious publication, other times they do not. There is also the matter of whether such publications fit the bill as Tier One media targets for a specific client, but that’s a different post.

Regardless of the respect commanded by such publications, their writers and editors, struggling with fewer resources and tightened budgets, are as prone as anyone else to occasional inaccuracies and errors in their work. Perhaps they even, on occasion, fall prey to temptation and give their copy a little extra sensationalist spin to grab the attention of fickle readers.

You may have heard about Yale law professor Amy Chua and the firestorm of controversy that erupted in the past week with the publication in the Wall Street Journal of her ode to “Why Chinese mothers are superior.”

The article was excerpted from her new book, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. The piece paints Chua as a near-sociopathic tyrant consumed by her quest to make her daughters successful overachievers, no matter how much kicking and screaming it sparks along the way.

“Here are some things my daughters, Sophia and Louisa, were never allowed to do,” Chua wrote.  “Attend a sleepover, have a playdate, be in a school play, complain about not being in a school play, watch TV or play computer games, choose their own extracurricular activities, get any grade less than an A, not be the No. 1 student in every subject except gym and drama, play any instrument other than the piano or violin, not play the piano or violin.”

There is even an incident where Chua banished her three-year-old daughter to the garden in subzero weather without a jacket for refusing to cooperate with her first piano lesson. The kid, however, proved herself every bit as stubborn as her mother and had to be coaxed back into the house with brownies and hot chocolate.

Not surprisingly, her essay provoked thousands of comments and even death threats.

However, it turned out that she had been somewhat misrepresented. It was WSJ editors, she claimed, who gave her article that incendiary title. And her book is not in fact a how-to manual, but a memoir of her experiences in trying to blend “western” parenting practices with the demanding methods employed by her own parents. In the end, she came to realize that the “tiger mother” method was in some ways too strict and she softened her approach . . . to a certain degree.

In an interview with the BBC earlier today, Chua articulates her position quite well and paints herself as a caring, loving mother who believes that children need a firm hand and a steady push to reach their full potential and acquire the confidence and self-reliance crucial to prospering in the real world. Many readers of the WSJ article, she says, missed the obvious comedy in the battles of will that erupted on several occasions with her daughters.

“It’s about helping your children be the best they can be, which is usually better than they think,” Chua said, rather than making their lives hell for getting anything less than straight A+s. It’s not the grades that are important, but the life lessons learned along the way.

I don’t want to get sidetracked into the pros and cons of her parenting approach. What I want to focus on is how deftly Chua has responded to the negative public outcry and media coverage that followed the publication of the WSJ article. I don’t know if she has engaged with any PR professionals for a crisis communications strategy, but she has certainly taken the right approach so far.

What has she done? Let’s recap:

  • She has remained calm, cool and collected. If you listen to that BBC audio interview, there is no defensiveness in her tone. She is giving clear, thoughtful responses that state and clarify her position.
  • She is not dwelling on placing blame on the WSJ for any perceived misrepresentations. She is, at least in the BBC interview, taking the highroad. In PR and crisis communications, this is the only road to take.
  • She has a message and she is sticking to it like glue. In less than two weeks, the Amy Chua brand has become a national, even international, phenomenon. Every word she utters to the media is now in the court of public opinion. Any communication in a public forum, be it a live interview, a blog post or a Tweet, must be formulated with this in mind.

Of course, even if the WSJ editors did misrepresent Chua, thereby igniting a public outcry that wasn’t entirely warranted, it hasn’t done her any harm. In fact, it’s likely why the book climbed to sixth place in Amazon.com’s sales rankings on its first day of release and garnered her interview requests from other leading media outlets.

Is any publicity good publicity? It all depends on how well prepared you are to manage the fallout.

Photo from: Todd Pack’s Messy Desk

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Facebook: ‘Irrational exuberance’ all over again?

social bubble 300x172 Facebook: ‘Irrational exuberance’ all over again?By Leo Valiquette

The verdict is still out as to whether Goldman Sachs’ investment in Facebook heralds an IPO, but the $50 billion valuation it places on the popular social media platform is nonetheless a scary portent.

While Alex blogged last week about what this deal could mean for those who use Facebook and other social media tools for work and play, I couldn’t help but think that history may be repeating itself.

Late last week, CFRA’s John Budden and Rob Snow discussed the logistics around Goldman Sachs’ “special purpose vehicle” intended to skirt around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission’s 500-shareholder rule. Rob characterized the US$500 million being put into Facebook by Goldman Sachs and Russian investment firm Digital Sky Technologies as a venture capital round, for lack of a better term.

“It’s just a staggering multiple for a private company,” Budden said of the lofty valuation the investment places on Facebook. Consider that $50 billion against the hard numbers: For 2009, Facebook had revenues of around US$777 million and net income of around $200 million.

“It has the feelings of the bubble that we experienced in year 2000, but it is different in character,” Budden said.

Some pundits over the past week have argued just how different in character this situation is versus a decade ago due to how deeply Facebook has dug its hooks into the lives of its 500 million+ users. The time that users spend on the site, as well as the personal information they provide, makes for a level of targeted advertising that remains an untapped gold mine.

But weren’t the pundits just as bullish in the late ’90s on the prospects of the dot-com boom’s rising stars and for the telecommunications and photonics companies, such as Nortel Networks, Alcatel and JDS Uniphase, that would build the optical backbone for it all?

I still remember the summer of 2000. I had just come to work for the Ottawa Business Journal after a year away from Ottawa. I was thrust into the midst of the feeding frenzy, new to both the world of business journalism and the overly optimistic mood that prevailed in Silicon Valley North at the time. Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, had already made his now famous comment about the overvaluation of the stock markets, saying it was a result of ‘irrational exuberance.”

My trial by fire to come up to speed on all this was facilitated by large does of ROBTv, the precursor to BNN. While the community at large crowed about the surging share price of market darlings such as Nortel, other, more sober-minded individuals were talking on ROBTv about the growing likelihood of a significant market correction, though even they couldn’t fortell the full extent of the cataclysm to come. Most people weren’t inclined to listen, in any case.

Describing this time period as “irrationally exuberant” doesn’t even begin to do it justice.

Nothing puts this entire period in perspective better than a quick look at the highs and lows of Nortel’s stock price. Nortel shares hit an all-time high of about $1,230 on July 26, 2000, if one adjusts for the 10-to-1 stock consolidation that happened years later. It accounted for fully one-third of the total valuation of the companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. When Nortel was delisted from the TSX in June 2009, it was worth 18.5 cents a share.

For those of us in the newsroom of the OBJ in the years that followed the dot-com bust, word of mass layoffs and the closure of photonics companies that had secured hundreds of millions of dollars in VC became weekly, almost daily, occurences. The rise of anchor companies like Nortel had created entire eco-systems that imploded as the market demand for all that optical bandwidth, and dot-com services based on business plans that were sketchy at best, didn’t materialize as expected.

And now, here we are, at the start of a whole new decade. Global Internet traffic has exploded. Not only has that dark fiber laid ahead of its time in the late 1990s been lit up, operators are trying to figure out how to boost its bandwidth capacity to meet the voracious demand that has been placed on access, metro and long-haul networks alike.

Still, have the pundits become any more adept at foretelling the future of something so fickle as consumer appetite for dot-com products and services? Is this a pointless question to ask given that the economy is subject to the will of individuals who manipulate markets and public perception for their own gain? If it’s not technology and Internet stocks, it’s subprime derivatives.

Now this isn’t to say that social media tools such as Facebook and Twitter lack practical business applications. We here at inmedia wholeheartedly believe that social media in all its various forms is an essential expansion pack for the traditional marketing toolbox. There are without doubt opportunities here to build solid, sustainable businesses. Facebook represents a paradigm shift in how people communicate no less disruptive than the widespread adoption of the telephone. This isn’t something that could happen; it is happening.

But Facebook needs hard revenue and profit numbers to justify a valuation of $50 billion. Numbers it has yet to achieve. Numbers that will have to be driven primarily by consumer, not business, activity. If it does come to market with an IPO that has such a rich multiple, what ripply effect will this have as others attempt to get in on the action with overhyped buyouts and public offerings of other social media platforms? Are we already on the express track to another boom-and-bust cycle driven by an opportunistic pump-and-dump mentality?

What do you think?

Photo from: bigmouth media

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,